We have been robbed of many good words and ideas that must be
restored to good and dignified use. Principal amongst them is
"Patriot", which was desecrated by passage of the treacherous and
traitorous "Patriot Act".
Against and For
Political movements are
commonly framed as opposition movements, “Citizens
Against…”. The Patriot Circle is not one of these.
Naturally, we oppose corruption, oppression, terror,
and abuse in all forms; but we also know that one
cannot end something by simple opposition, and if
one nominally succeeds, the resulting vacuum will
likely be filled by something no better.
One can only create real and
lasting change by standing for something different
and working constructively for it.
This is not a mere semantic difference.
When in opposition, one is necessarily bound by the
terms of definition and even the rules of the old
order: to simply oppose the government is to
implicitly accept its legitimacy and authority.
The myth of competition.
Throughout our lives, we have
been taught to believe that competition is the
natural way of the world and that it is good.
From our bedtime stories on through Little League
and business school, we're told -- and reinforce to
others and ourselves, there will be winners and
losers. And winning isn't just the most
important thing, winning is everything.
This framing of life as a
competitive game sets us all up to lose, for in
The political establishment, by its two-party
farce, has sold us the false belief that we are defined by our
differences which are more numerous and more important than our
commonalities, and pitted us against each other. It's a lie and an epic deceit.
We have been divided by issues
that are guaranteed to upset us because we allow the
parties to define the political agenda, which NEVER
addresses the common interest.
The truth is that we, the
People, agree on most measures that are most
important to us: we agree on life, liberty,
justice, and equality and want a Constitution that
guarantees our rights; we agree that we need the
basics of life such as clean air and water, healthy
food, access to medicine and care, ...; and we agree
that we want a government that represents us and our
interests, that provides quality education for our
Consensus is arguably the most
powerful form of group decision-making process.
While democracy is competitive and produces
"winners" and "losers", consensus is cooperative and
produces only "winners".
Consensus occurs when we agree
to agree. All may agree in principle or some
may agree and others may compromise their
disagreement in favor of allowing consensus to
occur. If one disagrees, one can block
consensus, meaning that no agreement is made, or
allow consensus to proceed by prioritizing consensus
Our Nation, America the Beautiful, set its
course and established the foundations of its legitimacy on the
recognition and declaration of certain universal and natural
principles as celebrated in the Charters of Freedom:
We hold these truths to be
self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed
by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these
are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.
The founders, representatives of the 13
colonies, overcame significant differences, defined their common
interests and common cause, and ratified a unanimous
Declaration of Independence. This achievement – the formation of
consensus at a moment of critical historical importance – made
possible the United States of America as a constitutional republic, and set a modern precedent:
— That to secure these rights,
Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers
from the consent of the governed, — That whenever any Form of
Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the
People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government,
laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers
in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their
Safety and Happiness.
In its inception, the “united States of
America” was a description, not a name. People united to
form States which united to form one Nation which became the
United States of America. The Constitution, which the National
Archives describes as “a model of
cooperative statesmanship and the art of compromise”, demanded
mature collaboration in the common interest both in its drafting and
in its exercise:
We the People of
the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish
Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence,
promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to
ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this
Constitution for the United States of America.
Of the process, considerations and challenges,
George Washington, eloquently defining the essence of consensus,
It is obviously
impracticable in the Federal Government of these States to secure
all rights of independent sovereignty to each, and yet provide for
the interest and safety of all. Individuals entering into society
must give up a share of liberty to preserve the rest. The magnitude
of the sacrifice must depend as well on situation and circumstance,
as on the object to be obtained. It is at all times difficult to
draw with precision the line between those rights which must be
surrendered, and those which may be preserved; and, on the present
occasion, this difficulty was increased by a difference among the
several States as to their situation, extent, habits, and particular
In all our deliberations on this
subject, we kept steadily in our view that which appears to us the
greatest interest of every true American, the consolidation of our
Union, in which is involved our prosperity, felicity,
safety--perhaps our national existence. This important
consideration, seriously and deeply impressed on our minds, led each
State in the Convention to be less rigid on points of inferior
magnitude than might have been otherwise expected; and thus, the
Constitution which we now present is the result of a spirit of
amity, and of that mutual deference and concession, which the
peculiarity of our political situation rendered indispensable.
That it will meet the full and entire
approbation of every State is not, perhaps, to be expected; but each
will, doubtless, consider, that had her interest alone been
consulted, the consequences might have been particularly
disagreeable or injurious to others; that it is liable to as few
exceptions as could reasonably have been expected, we hope and
believe; that it may promote the lasting welfare of that Country so
dear to us all, and secure her freedom and happiness, is our most
As we will show, the peculiarity of our present
political situation again renders indispensable that same spirit of
amity and mutual deference and concession in order to achieve a
result that elucidates the common interest and restores a
willingness to work together for the common cause of America.
Duality / Dualism
"An organized movement aimed at the overthrow of a
constituted government through use of subversion and
Yes, we are insurgents. A war has been declared on us
by our own institutions of power, in service now to an
invisible enemy, forcing us to the vigilance and
readiness of battle stance.
However, the Patriot Circle intends to abide strictly by
constitutional law and act peacefully in its pursuits -
and as such does not espouse sedition, treason or
terrorism, by any definition except those most recently
imposed to restrict democracy, human rights and
longstanding tenets of law, such as the "Patriot" Act
has created by deliberately confusing the meaning of
"constituted government" and misappropriating the
intentions of law in defense of institution (control
system), rather than citizen. Understanding this
definition of Insurgency as it pertains to the PC
therefore relies on a nuanced perspective and definition
of each of the contingent terms: "constituted
government"; "subversion"; and "armed conflict".
We assert that enemies of the People, foreign and
domestic, have seized control of the "constituted
government" via functional invalidation of its
constitutional mechanisms, the institution of
unconstitutional acts, and by the corruption of its
membership; and we seek to replace traitors with
patriots by established electoral process, thereby to
reestablish the rule of constitutional law by the repeal
of all unconstitutional acts - and thereby to restore
the integrity of "constituted government", free of enemy
We intend to subvert the enemy powers' control system by
exposing its existence, its practices, and it's effects,
and by restoring those wholesome things that it has
destroyed, such as the decent respect for pluralism, the
recognition of common interests, access to truth and
fact, the integrity of our institutions, the health of
our society, the common peace and prosperity, etc.
"Armed conflict" is an appropriate (albeit figurative)
description of what will be necessary to prevail against
the control system, which has substantially and
literally armed itself against us. We stand armed with
knowledge and the courage to act against the coercive,
aggressive and abusive methods of the control system,
its tactics of psychological warfare, its institutions
of oppression and fear. We will abstain from its
further empowerment and support by refusing to allow
ourselves to be enslaved and used, by cutting off its
sources of illusory power and by forcing it to fall on
its own swords.
Ends and Means
We should know from history, if
not instinct and common sense, that the public
agenda of our political institutions do not
represent the truth and indeed that the scope of the
lies takes only time to be exposed, no matter how
Within a control system, one
cannot trust stated intentions and must constantly
remember that the stated ends represent only that
which the system administrators wish to be true and
that which we use to justify participation in the
Examples: education, military
We have been conditioned to
focus on the stated ends and to rationalize the use
of questionable – and often reprehensible – means.
If the means are not just, moral, legal, then how
can the ends possibly be so?
(That we continue to trust and
to hope speaks not to our weakness, but our
strength, for these qualities represent our goodness
and demonstrate that all is not lost.)
If we cannot trust the stated
ends, we must turn our attention to the means, for
by any sensible measure, they are indeed all that
"Patriot" is a description reserved for those who
demonstrate their commitment to constitution and
country in word and deed.
A government for the wealthy.
Right and Responsibility
Rule of Law
The Party is Over
The term used by most conspiracy scholars to
describe the agenda of those engaged in globalism,
social engineering and power consolidation is George
Bush Sr.'s NWO (New World Order).
The problem with this term is that it implies
there was an existing old world order - which there
demonstrably was not. The world has always
been chaotic, with independent nation states
reflecting, to some extent or other, the values of
their peoples, and pursuing their own agendas.
So if world order is the globalist agenda (and we
know it to be from their own declarations), then, if
achieved, it will be a new experience in human
Therefore, we thought it appropriate to challenge
this insidious presupposition of NWO and suggest a
new and apt term: World Order Elites, or WOE.
The minions, such as Bush himself, are thus "agents
of WOE"; and the agenda(s), plans, institutions,
etc., the "agenda(s) of WOE"...